Preview

Vestnik of Samara State University of Economics

Advanced search

Blockchain predicts operational financial inclusion, not satisfaction: evidence from Nigeria

https://doi.org/10.46554/1993-0453-2026-9-263-127-138

Abstract

Nigeria set a target of ninety-five percent adult financial inclusion by 2024 under the Central Bank of Nigeria’s National Financial Inclusion Strategy 3.0; the target was not met, and the North-West zone retained 47% exclusion against 5% in the South-West zone [1]. Blockchain-based banking services have since entered Nigerian commercial banking at institutional scale through the Zone network and allied fintech platforms. Whether the service attributes of these systems move operational financial inclusion, customer satisfaction, or both remain unresolved, and the two outcomes imply different management priorities. This study examines data from 423 active commercial bank customers in Lagos (n = 250) and Kano (n = 173), collected in 2025. Multiple regression and multi-group Z-tests after Paternoster et al. [2] are applied, with five blockchain attributes (Security, Transparency, Decentralization operationalized as perceived accessibility without institutional gatekeeping, Transaction Speed, Cost Efficiency) modelled as formative composite predictors of operational Financial Inclusion and Customer Satisfaction separately. Results indicate that blockchain attributes explain 36.4% of variance in operational Financial Inclusion against 3.1% of variance in Customer Satisfaction, with Transparency (b = 0.349, p < 0.001) and Decentralization (b = 0.318, p < 0.001) as the dominant positive predictors in all subsamples. Z-tests find no significant coefficient differences between Lagos and Kano on any tested path, while descriptive baselines diverge sharply (operational Financial Inclusion mean 3.940 against 2.942). The study concludes that in this sample and pre-adoption environment, blockchain attributes behave as participation-oriented predictors more than satisfaction-oriented predictors, that the mechanism is structurally equivalent across Nigeria’s digital banking spectrum, and that closing the North-South gap requires lifting the institutional baseline alongside technology design.

About the Authors

Ph. B. Ibukun
Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
Russian Federation

Ibukun Philip Bayode – PhD Candidate at Graduate School of Economics and Management

Ekaterinburg



L. S. Ruzhanskaya
Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
Russian Federation

Lyudmila S. Ruzhanskaya – Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor of the Graduate School of Economics and Management

Ekaterinburg



References

1. Access to Financial Services in Nigeria (A2F) 2023 Survey / Enhancing Financial Innovation and Access. Lagos : EFInA, 2023. URL: https://efina.org.ng (date of access: 15.01.2026).

2. Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients / R. Paternoster, R. Brame, P. Mazerolle, A. Piquero // Criminology. 1998. Vol. 36, No. 4. Pp. 859–866. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01268.x.

3. National Financial Inclusion Strategy 3.0 / Central Bank of Nigeria. Abuja : CBN, 2022. URL: https://www.cbn.gov.ng (date of access: 15.01.2026).

4. Industry fraud report H1 2024 / Nigeria Inter-Bank Settlement System. Lagos : NIBSS, 2024. URL: https://nibss-plc.com.ng (date of access: 15.01.2026).

5. DeLone W.H., McLean E.R. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update // Journal of Management Information Systems. 2003. Vol. 19, No. 4. Pp. 9–30. doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748.

6. Parasuraman A., Zeithaml V.A., Berry L.L. SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality // Journal of Retailing. 1988. Vol. 64, No. 1. Pp. 12–40.

7. Schuetz S., Venkatesh V. Blockchain, adoption, and financial inclusion in India: research opportunities // International Journal of Information Management. 2020. Vol. 52. Article 101936. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.04.009.

8. Mavilia R., Pisani R. Blockchain and catching-up in developing countries: the case of financial inclusion in Africa // African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development. 2020. Vol. 12, No. 2. Pp. 151–163. doi:10.1080/20421338.2019.1624009.

9. Bayode I.P. Blockchain for digital banking: enhancing financial inclusion and satisfaction in Lagos, Nigeria // Vestnik of Samara State University of Economics. 2026. No. 4 (258). Pp. 180–191. doi:10.46554/1993-0453-2026-4-258-180-191.

10. Saunders M.N.K., Lewis P., Thornhill A. Research methods for business students. 8th ed. Harlow : Pearson Education, 2019.

11. Patton M.Q. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks : Sage Publications, 2002.

12. Regulatory framework for the use of unstructured supplementary service data (USSD) for financial services in Nigeria / Central Bank of Nigeria. Abuja : CBN, 2018.

13. Yamane T. Statistics: an introductory analysis. 2nd ed. New York : Harper and Row, 1967.

14. Diamantopoulos A., Winklhofer H.M. Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development // Journal of Marketing Research. 2001. Vol. 38, No. 2. Pp. 269–277. doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.2.269.18845.

15. Wanous J.P., Reichers A.E., Hudy M.J. Overall job satisfaction: how good are single-item measures? // Journal of Applied Psychology. 1997. Vol. 82, No. 2. Pp. 247–252. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.247.

16. Common method biases in behavioral research / P.M. Podsakoff, S.B. MacKenzie, J.Y. Lee, N.P. Podsakoff // Journal of Applied Psychology. 2003. Vol. 88, No. 5. Pp. 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.

17. Anderson J.C., Gerbing D.W. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach // Psychological Bulletin. 1988. Vol. 103, No. 3. Pp. 411–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411.

18. Multivariate data analysis / J.F. Hair, W.C. Black, B.J. Babin, R.E. Anderson. 8th ed. Andover : Cengage Learning, 2019.

19. Maramygin M.S., Chernova G.V., Reshetnikova L.G. Digital transformation of the financial services market in Russia: trends and features // Manager. 2019. Vol. 10, No. 3. Pp. 70–82. doi:10.29141/2218-5003-2019-10-3-7.

20. Kotliarov I.D. Digital transformation of the financial industry: the substance and trends // Manager. 2020. Vol. 11, No. 3. Pp. 72–81. doi:10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-3-6.

21. Krylov G.O., Seleznev V.M. Current state and development trends of blockchain technology in the financial sector // Finance: Theory and Practice. 2019. Vol. 23, No. 6. Pp. 26–35. doi:10.26794/2587-5671-2019-23-6-26-35.

22. Belozyorov S., Sokolovskaya O., Kim Yu. Fintech as a prerequisite for transformation in global financial markets // Foresight and STI Governance. 2020. Vol. 14, No. 2. Pp. 23–35. doi:10.17323/2500-2597.2020.2.23.35.

23. Rebiazina V.A., Tunkevichus E.O. Consumer digital trust: the main trends and research directions // Russian Management Journal. 2021. Vol. 19, No. 4. Pp. 429–450. doi:10.21638/spbu18.2021.403.

24. The Global Findex Database 2021 / World Bank. Washington, D.C. : World Bank, 2022. URL: https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/globalfindex (date of access: 15.01.2026).

25. Advancing financial inclusion through fintech / A.O. Adelaja, S.C. Umeorah, B.E. Abikoye, M.C. Nezianya // World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 2024. Vol. 23, No. 2. Pp. 427–438. doi:10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.2.2379.


Review

For citations:


Ibukun P., Ruzhanskaya L.S. Blockchain predicts operational financial inclusion, not satisfaction: evidence from Nigeria. Vestnik of Samara State University of Economics. 2026;(9):127-138. https://doi.org/10.46554/1993-0453-2026-9-263-127-138

Views: 9

JATS XML

ISSN 1993-0453 (Print)