Assessing the digital management maturity level at an enterprise
https://doi.org/10.46554/1993-0453-2026-5-259-110-118
Abstract
The relevance of this study is driven by the rapid development of digital technologies, which are changing the principles of management and the organization of enterprise business activities. Digital management is becoming a key factor in the development of organizations in the context of the transition to a digital economy, which aligns with the priorities of Russian state policy as well. However, the problem of assessing the level of digital management maturity at enterprises remains insufficiently addressed. The aim of this study is to develop and test an approach to assessing the level of digital management maturity at an enterprise. A combination of methods was used in the study. At the theoretical and methodological stage, the definition of digital management was formulated and its key components were identified based on the literature review. In the process of approach development, the multi-level maturity assessment model was created using a scoring system (from 1 to 5 points for each indicator). At the pilot phase, the model was applied to assess 12 small and medium-sized oil and gas enterprises in the Samara Region using the interview data, documentation analysis, and expert assessments (June – October 2025). The scientific novelty lies in the development of a comprehensive model for assessing the maturity of digital management at an enterprise, structured around five components (management characteristics, data management, digital environment, process organization, and management quality) and describing five sequential maturity levels. The testing of the model revealed most of the studied enterprises are at the second level – "partial digitalization." These enterprises are characterized by fragmented use of digital tools, the absence of a unified enterprise management information system, and the prevalence of manual data collection and an ad hoc approach to management decision-making. The key weaknesses identified include a high degree of dependence of business processes on the human factor and the lack of developed data analytics. The developed approach not only allows for the diagnosis of the current state of digital management at an enterprise but identifies specific areas for its development, serving as a roadmap for the transition to data-driven management as well.
About the Authors
O. A. BulavkoRussian Federation
Olga A. Bulavko - Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Professor
Samara
S. P. Parshakov
Russian Federation
Sergey P. Parshakov – lecturer at the Department of the Faculty of Secondary Vocational and Pre-professional Education
Samara
References
1. Ageev N.O., Bulavko O.A. Transformational aspects of the development strategy of industrial corporations // Vestnik of Samara State University of Economics. 2024. No. 12 (242). Pp. 22–29.
2. Nauglnova I.A. Design and process management as a factor of sustainable development of enterprises in the era of the digital economy // Informatization in the digital economy. 2023. Vol. 4, No. 3. Pp. 265–278. doi:10.18334/ide.4.3.119237. EDN JDPVBG.
3. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 07.05.2024 No. 309 "On the National Development Goals of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030 and for the future up to 2036".
4. Nauglnova I.A., Letunov E.A. Directions of increasing the competitiveness of an industrial enterprise in the era of the digital economy // Informatization in the digital economy. 2023. Vol. 4, No. 3. Pp. 295–306. doi:10.18334/ide.4.3.119244. EDN DFFWJH.
5. Features of the development of the industrial sphere in the modern economic system: innovative aspect / M.A. Izmailova, V.F. Ukolov, Yu. Sue [et al.]. Moscow : World of Science, 2025. 241 p. ISBN 978-5-907891-26-5. doi:10.15862/02MNNPM25. EDN DJYKKO.
6. Larionov V.G., Barinova E.P., Sheremetyeva E.N. Digital management: education and talents // Innovations in management. 2020. No. 2 (20). Pp. 56–63.
7. Kalyazina E.G. Digital management in project management // Creative economy. 2021. Vol. 15, No. 12. Pp. 4747–4766.
8. Vakorin M.P., Hvorostina V.V. Digital management in project management // Young Scientist. 2023. No. 9 (456). Pp. 16–18.
9. Alexandrova T.V. Digitalization as a modern trend in the development of management of industrial organizations // Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Economics and Management. 2019. No. 3. Pp. 137–144. doi:10.14529/em190313.
10. Antonov V.G., Samosudov M.V. Problems and prospects of digital management development // E-Management. 2018. No. 2. Pp. 38–48. doi:10.26425/2658-3445-2018-2-38-48.
11. Mikhnenko P.A. Digital management: models of concept development // Innovations in management. 2020. No. 3 (25). Pp. 30–39.
12. Pozharitskaya I.M. Digital management: concept or toolkit? // Baikal Research Journal. 2021. No. 2. doi:10.17150/2411-6262.2021.12(2).12.
13. Management of digital economy organizations / G. Sheve, S. Huzig, G.I. Gumerova, E.S. Shaimieva. Moscow : Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 2022. 302 p.
14. Shcherbakov V.V., Silkina G.Yu., Shevchenko S.Yu. From a business model to business processes: a methodology for setting management in a digital environment // RISC: Resources, information, supply, competition. 2021. No. 2. Pp. 29–34.
15. Where and how to target your digital business transformation?. URL: https://www.gartner.com/en/information-technology/topics/digital-transformation (date of access: 12.09.2025).
16. What is digital transformation?. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-explainers/what-is-digital-transformation (date of access: 12.09.2025).
Review
For citations:
Bulavko O.A., Parshakov S.P. Assessing the digital management maturity level at an enterprise. Vestnik of Samara State University of Economics. 2026;(5):110-118. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46554/1993-0453-2026-5-259-110-118
JATS XML